Now then, I had a bit of a windfall today. No one else is likely to be excited by my find, but I sure am.
One of my many self-imposed tasks is the cataloguing of all my children’s annuals. The vast majority of them are done; once listed for my satisfaction, I’ve been passing the data on to an online cataloguing site, so as to benefit other collectors by increased access. I know how much I’ve appreciated the work of others, so it’s rather nice to be able to contribute in turn.
Alas, as so many of my projects end up, it has taken a lot longer than I planned, and grown into a much bigger undertaking than I first thought. Not that I haven’t been having fun–make no mistake about that. One of the burgeoning aspects, though, has been trying to accurately date the editions. Some publishers most delightfully dated their annuals; some put at least a volume number, from which a year can be extrapolated; others included a printing code, which I, unfortunately, am too ignorant to decipher. Then there are the ones who simply didn’t believe in making things easy for future researchers, and eschewed the use of any identifying features.
One of the more prolific publishers was Dean & Son. Beginning in the 1930s, through to the mid-70s, they produced a colossal number–quite literally hundreds–of what could be classed as annuals. Some were in a series–true annuals: Champion, Ideal, Monster Books for “Boys,” a matching set for “Girls,” and to a lesser extent, for “Children” and for “Tinies.” Then there were all the one-of books or four-book sets, which might not technically be annuals, but were part of their output. Dean was also one of those publishers who used a printing code and no other dates, until they finally began to do so in the early ‘sixties.
At any rate, as I was trying to figure out publication years, I found something fascinating. Unlike most book publishers, Dean & Son moved around–a lot. Now, they may not have travelled very far, (one such was due to the war) but the colophons on the title pages reflect the moves, and help narrow down the possibilities. I got a good lead on this from an article I read online (which I can’t find anymore–if I track it down, I’ll link to it; there were six different addresses:
- Debrett House, 29, King Street, Covent Garden (1930-32)
- 6, La Belle Sauvage, Ludgate Hill (1933-1938)
- Debrett House, 41/43, Ludgate Hill (1939-41)
- 61, High Path, Merton (1942-48)
- 41/43 Ludgate Hill (1949-55)
- 41/43 Ludgate Hill imprint (1956-74)
(As promised, the link: www.vintagepopupbooks.com/Dean-Son-Publishers-History-s/1853.htm)
As might be expected, there is a wee bit of crossover, since they didn’t necessarily shift quarters on January 1st, nor publish their entire workload two days before Christmas (though they were aiming for that market.) The most ambiguous set is the “Monster Books,” which has eight volumes with the first 41/43 colophon, unlike the other sets, which all have seven. Obviously, it was either the last to be printed that final year at High Path, or else the first with the new imprint, in 1956. After much juggling and deep cogitations, I came to the conclusion that it had to be the latter.
Another significant factor, which I didn’t realize at the start, was page numbers. While there was a large variation in size between the various early ones–some were 140, some 156, some 188 pages–in 1951 they reduced all of the annuals to a consistent 124/125 page limit.
Finally, there are the inscriptions. While caution is recommended–for a book may be gifted to someone many years after publication–an inscription is still a great boon. It certainly provides a “not after” date, which is no small thing. Also, if you end up with three of the same volumes with the same date, the evidence is pretty conclusive.
All of these items, pieced together from various sources, lead to a pretty satisfying collection–if I can’t buy as many books as I would like, I can collate them into a catalogue, perhaps the most comprehensive one in existence.
Booksellers, who supply the bulk of my information, have a broad scope of ways to let you know what product they are selling. This ranges from nothing at all (“Chatterbox annual, good condition”) which is absolutely useless, to a detailed listing worth a feast (scans of title page, table of contents, etc. Thank you very much!) Naturally, for identification, a picture of the cover is the most pertinent method, or at least a description thereof; first story (that’s a big one), number of pages, and inscriptions are quite welcome tidbits as well.
So, after all that, back to my little find. A few times, there have been volumes mentioned that I have never seen. They are included on the list, in the hope of one day finding them. And today I ran across a copy that I had long been seeking: